| É
D I T O R I A L
Des bureaucrates heureux!
The happy bureaucrats!
INTERVIEW
The African Union (AU)
PERSONNEL
WHO-OMS: Vote - Allez voter
Former UN experts and health insurance
Spécial imprimerie:
Au service des clients
Une grande famille
Du stencil au numérique
Staff Gala
Gala du personnel
Souvenirs de carrière
Assurance mutuelle maladie/accidents
A glimmer of hope at the ILOAT?
Harassment
Continuing Contracts
GLOBE
The values we are defending
Modern Mental Health Services
Le troisième jeudi de novembre
ARTS
Féeries sphériques
UN days, jazzy nights
Le théâtre japonais de nô
"Aegean: images of Greece"
TECH NEWS
La salle de classe virtuelle
|
|
The happy bureaucrats!
A few days ago I had the happy surprise to see a very good friend of
mine, a colleague in fact. He had come from the other side of the world
to familiarize himself with the intricacies of « Galaxy »,
our famous new recruitment system. Why in Geneva? Perhaps because of its
clear skies? Or perhaps because a « junket » was necessary
to make this heavy system more palatable?
This little get-together must have cost the Organization a small fortune.
Why then do I always find it so difficult to find money for training courses
that useful for my work while the administration can happily spend thousands
and in some cases millions of dollars on training people in heavy and
useless bureaucratic procedures? And this is not the first time
Cast your minds back to the mid- 1990s, when the 9,000 UN staff members
were obliged to take a two-day training course to learn to use the new
UN performance evaluation system, the (in)famous PAS. 18,000 working days
were wasted excluding of course those of the consultants who taught
the courses to try to understand a complex system of which, after
much tinkering, nothing remains. The IMIS management system, which is
not only heavy but also obsolete, spawned similar training courses. There
always seems to be money available for such staff development courses.
This allocation of resources is again evidence that the Organization
has been perverted by bureaucrats who impose complex procedures to justify
their existence and that what counts is not our substantive work, but
that these bureaucrats should be happy and the bureaucracy should thrive.
Editor-in-Chief: Jean Michel
Jakobowicz
|