UN Special N° 642 Juillet - Août • July - August 2005

Personnel
Roses & CactusRoses & Cactus

RosesRosesThe paramount consideration in the appointment, transfer or promotion of staff shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity, and you better not be a smoker.
When I first heard rumours that there would be a phrase on the WHO Vacancy Notice to say that WHO does not recruit smokers, I truly believed that it would never happen, that eventually reason would take the upper hand.
I am not a smoker. However, this phrase smacks of discrimination (but I am made to understand that smokers are not a protected class) and as a human being who believes in personal freedom, I am alarmed. We are not a private company we are a public service, a public service who supposedly defends human rights and not made to behave like some character out of an Orwellian novel.
Now, I do tend to be on the chubby side. With Weight Watchers coming into WHO and other UN organizations to control the weight of its staff, will this put those of us who are a bit on the heavy side in danger of being excluded from these institutions. Or will that glass of wine be the culprit? What will be next? Unacceptable life styles? Testing of urine for chemical substances? Drugs? Chronic diseases? Unsafe sex?
CactusCactus As the Vacancy Notices have gone up, I presume the legal repercussion and implication of this decision have been fully studied and analysed by the Legal Office. I am truly amazed that WHO would take such a drastic action. Surely, we are opening ourselves to future legal actions. What perplexes me is the recruitment/selection process. How will the question be formulated during the interview? Will the secret smoker (if selected) then be summarily dismissed for fraudulent behaviour or serious misconduct, if ever he was caught at the local Migros puffing away, or lighting up on the way out of his parking place?
Yes, WHO has a mission — to rid the world of smokers and users of tobacco; but to stop individuals from their right to employment because of a habit, that to my knowledge is still legal, is absurd and just does not seem the right way to go.

Up
UNSpecial About Us | Terms of Use | Contact Us | © 2001-2005 UN Special